Objection to cooked meat in general

Raw feeding aims to mimic the diet that associate degree animal within the wild would consume
Raw food soul Dr Ian Billinghurst (owner of the registered trademark 'Barf Diet' and therefore the regorge World Distributor Network) argues in his books that the dog has evolved over several million years on a natural raw diet and logically, this is often the perfect food supply. He claims that methoded foods area unit "not what [the] dog was programmed to eat throughout its long process of evolution" and says that foods almost like those eaten by the dog's wild ancestors area unit a lot of biologically acceptable.[5]
Proponents have additionally pointed at the practices of some fashionable zoos that feed their captive carnivores meat and bones or whole carcasses.[5][6] The custodian of the Folsom town menagerie Sanctuary has aforementioned that "Common sense suggests that there's no a lot of nourishing food we will supply to a carnivore than the complete body of their natural prey kind." whereas raw feeding is mostly well accepted in European zoos, it's a disputed topic at intervals yank zoos.[7] considerations area unit almost like those expressed by opponents of raw feeding and includes dental impactions, airway obstructions, internal organ perforations, food contamination and social aggression. advantages embody higher oral health, mental stimulation through process of body (see activity enrichment) and better activity level. [8]
Critics have seen the issues in associating "natural" with better[9] and Billinghurst himself warns against that stating "There area unit grave dangers that go beside the natural diet and natural conditions the ancestors or wild cousins of our dogs swallow."[5] Katie Merwick, UN agency runs associate degree animal rescue sanctuary cautions against "making a fetish out of what animals eat the wild